Posted in August 18, 2010 ¬ 7:59 amh.Ray
There have been a number of Microsoft ESRP submissions this past quarter, especially in the over 5K mailbox category and they now total 12 submissions in this category alone. The above chart is one or a series of charts from our recent StorInt(tm) dispatch on Exchange performance. This chart displays an Exchange email counterpart [...]
Read the rest of this entry »
Posted in July 20, 2010 ¬ 10:52 amh.Ray
The above chart on SPECsfs(R) 2008 results was discussed in our latest performance dispatch that went out to SCI’s newsletter subscribers last month. We have described Apple’s great CIFS ORT performance in previous newsletters but here I would like to talk about NetApp’s CIFS ORT results. NetApp had three new CIFS submissions published this past [...]
Read the rest of this entry »
Posted in June 22, 2010 ¬ 11:49 amh.Ray
The chart shown here reflects information from a SCI StorInt(tm) dispatch on the latest Storage Performance Council benchmark performance results and depicts the top IO operations done per second per installed drive for SPC-1 and SPC-1/E submissions. This particular storage performance metric is one of the harder ones to game. For example, adding more drives to [...]
Read the rest of this entry »
Posted in May 20, 2010 ¬ 1:38 pmh.Ray
Well after last months performance reversals and revelations we now return to the more typical review of the latest Exchange Solution Review Program (ESRP 3.0) for Exchange 2010 results. Microsoft’s new Exchange 2010 has substantially changed the efficiency and effectiveness of Exchange database I/O. This will necessitate a new round of ESRP results for all [...]
Read the rest of this entry »
Storage, Storage performanceChart of the month, DAG, Database availability group, EMC, ESRP, Exchange 2010, Exchange performance, HP, IBM, IBM XIV
Posted in April 27, 2010 ¬ 9:58 amh.Ray
We return now to our ongoing quest to understand the difference between CIFS and NFS performance in the typical data center. As you may recall from past posts and our newsletters on this subject, we had been convinced that in SPECsfs 2008 CIFS had almost 2X the throughput of NFS in SPECsfs 2008 benchmarks. Well as [...]
Read the rest of this entry »
Posted in February 16, 2010 ¬ 10:03 amh.Ray
One astute reader of our performance reports pointed out that some ESRP results could be skewed by the number of drives that are used during a run. So, we included a database transfers per spindle chart in our latest Exchange Solution Review Program (ESRP) report on 1001 to 5000 mailboxes in our latest newsletter. The chart [...]
Read the rest of this entry »
Posted in January 15, 2010 ¬ 9:28 amh.Ray
Above we reproduce a chart from our latest newsletter StorInttm Dispatch on SPECsfs(R) 2008 benchmark results. This chart shows the top 10 CIFS throughput benchmark results as of the end of last year. As observed in the chart Apple’s Xserve running Snow Leopard took top performance with over 40K CIFS throughput operations per second. My [...]
Read the rest of this entry »
Posted in December 22, 2009 ¬ 5:00 pmh.Ray
Latest SPC-2 (Storage Performance Council-2) benchmark results chart displaying the top ten in aggregate MBPS(TM) broken down into Large File Processing (LFP), Large Database Query (LDQ) and Video On Demand (VOD) throughput results. One problem with this chart is that it really only shows 4 subsystems: HDS and their OEM partner HP; IBM DS5300 and [...]
Read the rest of this entry »
Storage, Storage performanceBenchmarks, Chart of the month, Database transfers, file processing, HDS, HDS USP-V, HP, HP XP24000, IBM, IBM DS5300, IBM SVC, SPC-2, Sun, Sun 6780, video on demand