Today, I attended a webinar where Pat Gelsinger, President of Information Infrastructure at EMC discussed their concept for a new product based on the Yotta Yotta technology they acquired a few years back. Yotta Yotta’s product was a distributed, coherent caching appliance that had FC front end ports, an Infiniband appliance internal network and both FC and WAN backend links.
What one did with Yotta Yotta nodes was place them in front of your block storage, connect them together via infiniband locally and via a WAN technology (of your choice, then) and then you could access any data behind the appliances from any attached location. They also provided very quick transferring of bulk data between remote nodes. So, their technology allowed for very rapid data transmission over standard WAN interfaces/distances and provided a distributed cache across those very same distances to the data behind the appliances.
I like caching appliances as much as anyone but they had become prominent only in the late 70’s and early 80’s mostly because caching technology was hard to do with the storage subsystems of the day, but they went away a long time ago. Nowadays, you can barely purchase a lone disk drive without a cache in them. So what’s different.
Introducing DaaD
Today we have SSDs and much cheaper processing power. I wrote about new caching appliances like DataRam‘s XcelaSAN in a Cache appliances rise from the dead post I did after last years SNW. But EMC’s going after a slightly broader domain – the world. The caching appliance that EMC is discussing is really intended to support distributed data access, or as I like to call it, Data-at-a-Distance (DaaD).
How can this work? Data is stored on subsystems at various locations around the world. A DaaD appliance is inserted in front of each of these and connected over the WAN. Some or all of that data is now re-configured (at block or more likely LUN level) to be accessible at distance from each DaaD data center. As each data center reads and writes data from/to their remote brethern, some portion of that data is cached locally in the DaaD appliance and the rest is only available by going to the remote site (with considerably higher latency).
This works moderately well for well behaved, read intensive workloads where 80% of the IO is to 20% of the data (most of which is cached locally). But block writes present a particularly nasty problem as any data write has to be propagated to all cache copies before acknowledged.
It’s possible write propagation could be done via invalidating the data in cache (so any subsequent read would need to re-access the data from the original host). Nevertheless, to even know which DaaD nodes have a cached copy of a particular block, one needs to maintain a dictionary of all globally identifiable blocks held in any DaaD cache node at every moment in time. Any such table would change often, will necessarily need to be updated very carefully, deadlock free and atomically with non-failable transactions – therein lies one of the technological hurdles. Doing this quickly without impacting performance is another hurdle.
So simple enough, EMC takes Yotta Yotta’s technology, updates it for todays processors, networking, and storage, and releases it as a data center federation enabler. So, what can one do with a federated data center, well that’s another question and it involves Vmotion, and must be a subject for a future post …